I read this too quickly and assume the genus Lepidella was been resurrected. Section Lepidella is OK, although we know this taxon is a Saproamanita and the genus is becoming increasingly accepted, and I accept it. I recently re-identified all the 'inactive' records as Saproamanita
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
This is a Sapromanita and not a Lepidella