|
replaced with |
|
No comment which direction to curate in, but in terms of the mechanics,
as long as you're ok with 'move children to output' exactly making
Nubila metagera -> Splendeuptychia metagera
Nubila moderata -> Splendeuptychia moderata
Nubila nortia -> Splendeuptychia nortia
Nubila purusana -> Splendeuptychia purusana
Nubila segesta -> Splendeuptychia segesta
if there's situations where there's not exact 1-to-1 maping with the same species epithet spelling, please sort those children out first lest 'move children to output' makes a mess
but if there is exact 1-to-1 mapping this should work
Thanks, there's just the issue of nortia which is now considered a subspecies of gera so I could do that manually first (subspecies gera nortia was already added to the system by someone else). @atronox Are you ok with this?
@belgianbirding thanks very much! Would leave nortia wherever it is at the moment.
@kwilmott nortia is currently at species level so should I move it to Splendeuptychia nortia or Splendeuptychia gera nortia to match BOA?
Splendeuptychia nortia, as it is in Espeland et al. 2023. Thanks @belgianbirding!
@kwillmott @loarie Is it ok to commit this?