Taxonomic Swap 92117
(Submetido em 02-01-2024)
|
|
replaced with |
|
Comentários
https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:143068-2 Shows no varieties. But also doesn't show that varieties have been synonymized. So it might be worth sharing your source material with bi@kew.org
I don't know about some of these other flora projects. I'm kinda of the opinion that whoever wants move stuff should at least double check with the resources where the plants live , just out of curiosity I looked at all three leading taxonomies in Washington, Oregon, and California, and they all agree on what I already said?!
Again, we are open to deviations from our framework with POWO, but they have to be discussed by the community and done with appropriate references. I suggest you make a flag on the species, as you and I are the only ones who will likely ever see this discussion here.
This is one of our wildflower show plants, and the botanists that do the verifications don't seem to get a consistent ID with the two, and then their ID's vary from year to year.
But Oregon Flora Project recognizes two different L. dissectums; so OFP is the flora used for the shows in Oregon.
Lomatium dissectum var. dissectum
Lomatium dissectum var. multifidum
Going by their maps the one I have is most likely L. dissectum var. dissectum?