Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Chionactis. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Chionactis occipitalis 27289

Taxonomic Split 84958 (Submetido em 11-11-2020)

See https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/445206
Both Reptile Database (RD) and SSAR carve off
Chionactis occipitalis annulata & Chionactis occipitalis klauberi as Chionactis annulata annulata & Chionactis annulata klauberi
RD also lumps Chionactis into Sonora (e.g. Sonora occipitalis & Sonora annulatus) but I'm not doing that yet since SSAR hasn't done that yet

desconhecido
Adicionado(s) por loarie em 12 de novembro de 2020, 12:05 AM | Committed by loarie on 11 de novembro de 2020
dividido em

Comentários

Did this apply correctly? It's keeping a lot of "Mojave" shovelnose outside of the range.

Publicado por silversea_starsong mais de 3 anos antes

I haven't committed it yet (but was about to)

Publicado por loarie mais de 3 anos antes

committed now - but will take a while to process

Publicado por loarie mais de 3 anos antes

I just realized this was a series of taxon changes, not just one, and this one is still draft.

Publicado por silversea_starsong mais de 3 anos antes

you can read more here https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/445206 I held off on spliting Chilomeniscus stramineus into straminea, fasciata & cincta and lumping Chionactis and Chilomeniscus into Sonora (as RD does) since SSAR doesn't - but both RD and SSAR are going with this occipitalis/annulata split so it seems uncontroverslai

Publicado por loarie mais de 3 anos antes

Adicionar um Comentário

Iniciar Sessão ou Registar-se to add comments