Sarcoscypha spp. in Europe




In late winter and early spring, beautiful red cup fungi of genus Sarcoscypha can be found growing on fallen twigs and branches. In Europe, there are three possible species (four if you include S. macaronesica, a species endemic to Macaronesia that was also found on the Balearic islands): S. coccinea, S. austriaca and S. jurana. Orange, yellow and white forms are also known from these species. Even though they all prefer slightly different substrates, there is some overlap. For instance, even though S. jurana seems to only grow on Tilia spp., S. austriaca, possibly the most abundant species in Temperate Europe (in the Mediterranean area, the most abundant species certainly is S. coccinea), has been reported to sometimes also grow on Tilia spp. It doesn't help that it is seldom possible to confidently identify the species of a fallen twig. (Some substrates seem to be unambiguous, though. S. austriaca is for instance the only species reported growing on Alnus spp., S. coccinea the only one on Quercus ilex and Pseudotsuga menziesii.) And macroscopic differentiation, well... The outside of S. coccinea tends(!) to be a bit less pale than the outside of the other two species, but not always, and it also may(!) have a slightly more hairy/spikey cap margin, but this might turn out to be a false generalisation, and the two other species do not differ macroscopically in any significant way from each other. Which means that unfortunately, you really cannot identify any one of the three species without microscopy.

But under the microscope, they are quite easily distinguished, at least while they are still fresh (if not, you may have to look for germinating spores, which can take for ages). Normally, you will just need to look for the distribution, amount and size of the oil droplets in fresh spores and if the small hairs on the outer surface of the cup are straight or curled up like a corkscrew. In the observations linked to this journal entry, you will find pictures of all relevant microscopic features of freshly collected specimens. In the literature section, you will find microscopic keys and further descriptions.

Exceptions: According to @epopov, the Saint Petersburg and Moskow area are devoid of S. coccinea and S. jurana: "In this particular area, my attempts to find Sarcoscypha coccinea or S. jurana for more than 20 years have not been successful. Among several hundreds herbarium specimens i've seen all reliable collections of other [non-austriaca] species of this genus in European part of Russia were made south of the latitude of Moscow, in the zone of broadleaved forests and further south in the Caucasus." (source) The same can be said for Estonia, as this study has found out, and for Finland, where according to @bodhiheera (see comments) a very active mycological community has looked "for ages" for S. coccinea, but found nothing. In my subjective(!) opinion that is sufficient evidence to rule out other Sarcoscypha spp. in the region between Estonia, Moscow and Finland, until verified findings of S. coccinea or S. jurana in the region appear (so I would still encourage microscopy). In my subjective opinion, every other place in Europe (with the exception of the Macaronesian islands with their endemic S. macaronesica, of course) still needs microscopic analysis.

If you have valuable information to add, please do so in the comment section. Just because I'm writing this journal entry doesn't mean I'm the leading expert on those fungi.


Literature:

Czech:

Dutch:

English:

French:

German:

Italian:

Polnish:

Spanish:

Swedish:

Ukrainian:

Posted on 22 de fevereiro de 2024, 09:36 PM by mangoblatt mangoblatt

Observações

Fotos / Sons

Observador

mangoblatt

Data

Fevereiro 17, 2024 11:42 AM CET

Descrição

ex Acer platanoides

Fotos / Sons

Observador

mangoblatt

Data

Fevereiro 18, 2024 02:13 PM CET

Descrição

ex Tilia sp.

Fotos / Sons

Observador

mangoblatt

Lugar

Hessen, DE (Google, OSM)

Comentários

There's also a last species endemic from Macaronesia: Sarcoscypha macaronesica.

Publicado por nschwab 2 meses antes

@nschwab yes, that's true. I meant Europe in a way that does not include Macaronesia. I should have specified this and have done so now. Maybe I'll also add some links for S. macaronesica.

Publicado por mangoblatt 2 meses antes

Also, Sarcoscypha austriaca might be the most common species in temperate Europe (even though it might be regional preference...) but Sarcoscypha coccinea is way more common in the Mediterranean area.

Publicado por nschwab 2 meses antes

thank you, I've corrected it now!

Publicado por mangoblatt 2 meses antes
Publicado por rudolphous 2 meses antes

great, I'll add them

I'd actually prefer that you don't delete your comment; maybe it animates other people to contribute articles in their language

Publicado por mangoblatt 2 meses antes

Here are some beautiful microscopic documentations of S. austriaca: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/146647694
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/150244465

Publicado por mangoblatt 2 meses antes

How long do they stay fresh enough to see the oil bodies (let's say in a bag of moist moss)?

Publicado por ljazz 2 meses antes

that is a good question, @ljazz. As a rule of thumb I would advice to do microscopy in the first three days after collecting. If you know that they didn't grow on Tilia spp., you can take your time, because you know that it cannot be S. jurana. S. coccinea and S. austriaca can be differentiated by looking at the excipular hairs alone (though I would recommend to also look at the spores).

Publicado por mangoblatt 2 meses antes

I've added a paragraph above. Turns out that in the Saint Petersburg / Moscow region, only S. austriaca can be found, as @epopov can attest.

Publicado por mangoblatt 2 meses antes

In Estonia and Finland you keep S. coccinea as possible but not in Leningrad Region. What is the difference between those places?

Publicado por bodhiheera 2 meses antes

@bodhiheera I don't. The difference is time. I have the information that S. coccinea and S. jurana aren't present in the Saint Petersburg and Moskow area for like 4 hours. So since four hours, I am re-evaluating identifications in this area. I cannot re-evaluate thousands of IDs at the same time.

Publicado por mangoblatt 2 meses antes

Following your reasoning, what can be such a strong evidence to shatter away your doubt concerning the Russian observations? In Estonia, the case was studied, as you know, and that was not evidence enough for you. The Finnish active fungal community has been trying to find coccinea for ages, in vain.

S. coccinea is said (by Baral) to be marine, close to the sea, and not continental. Leningrad region is at the same sea than Estonia, Finland and Sweden.

There are still plenty of pics of coccinea from Russia online. Part of them are from professionals working with fungi. What about them?

Publicado por bodhiheera 2 meses antes

The Estonian study explicitly says: "The data above suggests that S. coccinea s. str. might occur in Estonia, as it is present in Sweden, but present data are questionable." I took that study by its word, not claiming more than it claimed. This study together with the statement from epopov (who is a mycologist studying the distribution of discomycetes) and your statements about the Finnish community made me change my mind, as there are now good indications for the whole region that S. austriaca is the only present species. Yes, I could have listened earlier to you telling me that, despite the active Finnish community looking for them, there is no evidence for other species than S. austriaca in Finland. Yes, I could have, and I have done so, now, as more evidence from different sources and places of the region have accumulated.

S. coccinea is of course present in Russia, for instance in the caucasus region. If you know of Russian S. coccinea observations north of Moscow or in Moscow, preferably with microscopy, please link them to me.

Publicado por mangoblatt 2 meses antes

Adicionar um Comentário

Iniciar Sessão ou Registar-se to add comments